Wondering whether E951 or E967 is safer? We compared both ingredients based on independent research, regulatory status, and known health effects.
Quick Verdict
E967 is the safer choice based on current research.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Factor
E951
E967
Safety Rating
⚠️ Use With Caution
✅ Generally Safe
Safety Score
60/100
90/100
Category
artificial sweeteners
artificial sweeteners
About E951
EU code for aspartame. Controversial artificial sweetener classified as 'possibly carcinogenic' by IARC.
About E967
EU code for xylitol. Sugar alcohol that fights cavities. Toxic to dogs.
E951 vs E967: Key Differences
E951 is rated caution while E967 is rated safe
E951 falls under the artificial sweeteners category
E967 falls under the artificial sweeteners category
There is a 30-point safety difference between them
Which Should You Choose?
Based on available research, E967 appears to be the safer option. However, individual sensitivities vary — scan any product with the free CheckIt app to get a personalized safety assessment.
EU code for aspartame. Controversial artificial sweetener classified as 'possibly carcinogenic' by IARC.
Is E967 safe to eat?
EU code for xylitol. Sugar alcohol that fights cavities. Toxic to dogs.
Which is healthier: E951 or E967?
E967 has a better safety profile based on current research. Use the CheckIt app to scan products containing either ingredient for a detailed breakdown.
Can I avoid both E951 and E967?
Yes! The CheckIt app can filter products by specific ingredients you want to avoid. Scan any product to see all ingredients instantly.