Wondering whether Carboxymethylcellulose or E405 is safer? We analyzed both ingredients using FDA regulatory data, EU food safety assessments, and peer-reviewed research to help you make an informed choice.
Bottom line: E405 scores 90/100 vs 60/100 — making it the safer choice.
Scores based on regulatory status, research consensus, and known health effects. Not medical advice.
| Factor | Carboxymethylcellulose | E405 |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Rating | ⚠️ Use With Caution | ✅ Generally Safe |
| Safety Score | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Category | thickeners | thickeners |
A thickener in ice cream, salad dressings, and gluten-free products. May promote gut inflammation.
Carboxymethylcellulose is classified as a thickeners and has a safety rating of caution (60/100). Most health experts consider it acceptable in moderation.
Modified alginate used in salad dressings and beer foam. Generally safe.
E405 is classified as a thickeners and has a safety rating of safe (90/100). Most health experts consider it acceptable in moderation.
Every Friday: the 5 worst products we found this week, FDA recall alerts, and the cleanest new finds at your grocery store.
Trusted by 27,000+ app users. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Based on current evidence, E405 appears to be the safer option. However, individual responses can vary based on genetics, health conditions, and consumption levels.
Want to check if a specific product contains Carboxymethylcellulose or E405? The free CheckIt app uses AI to scan any product and instantly break down every ingredient.
Scan Any Product Free with CheckIt AI →Get a free weekly breakdown of the most dangerous food additives, new research findings, and the cleanest products at every major store.
Trusted by 27,000+ app users. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Join 50,000+ families scanning smarter.
1,505 products scanned today · Point your camera at any label
Get the Free App →Free forever · No credit card · Works on iPhone & Android
CheckIt AI. (2026). "Carboxymethylcellulose vs E405: Safety, Side Effects & Which to Avoid (2026)". Climaverse PBC. Retrieved from https://getcheck.it/compare/carboxymethylcellulose-vs-e405"Carboxymethylcellulose vs E405: Safety, Side Effects & Which to Avoid (2026)." CheckIt AI, Climaverse PBC, 2026-04-04. https://getcheck.it/compare/carboxymethylcellulose-vs-e405.<a href="https://getcheck.it/compare/carboxymethylcellulose-vs-e405">Carboxymethylcellulose vs E405: Safety, Side Effects & Which to Avoid (2026) — CheckIt AI</a>@misc{checkit2026comparecarboxymethylcellulosevse405,
title = {Carboxymethylcellulose vs E405: Safety, Side Effects & Which to Avoid (2026)},
author = {CheckIt AI},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Climaverse PBC},
url = {https://getcheck.it/compare/carboxymethylcellulose-vs-e405},
note = {Retrieved 2026-04-04}
}